Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
| Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here | ||
|
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: I am requesting protection for 10 articles: 2010 Little League World Series through 2019 Little League World Series, inclusive.
There has been, and continues to be (as recently as today), intermittent but persistent long-term vandalism by an anonymous editor who uses various IP addresses. This person (or perhaps bot) continues to demonstrate a clear determination to corrupt the information in these articles. Most edits to these articles over the past year have been vandalism and reverts thereof. As these articles are about events that happened 5+ years ago, few to no future legitimate changes are expected. Requesting page protection for an indefinite amount of time. Dmoore5556 (talk) 21:57, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I clicked through all of these articles, and I see three total recent incidents of disruption among them. On the other hand, 2013 Little League World Series demonstrates why it's a bad idea to just lock off an historical event article. The event hasn't changed, but the world has. There's zero active disruption, just a couple of ip vandals in the last few months. BusterD (talk) 13:44, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Arbcom: India Pakistan articles. Heyaaaaalol (talk) 01:31, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Heyaaaaalol, contrary to the very similarly named WP:ARBPIA, the WP:ARBIPA area has no automatic extended-confirmed protection. There has been some disruptive editing in the history of this article, but no recent incident. Is there a specific reason for requesting this today? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:01, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: There is a high level of IP vandalism occurring. The season’s grand finale has not yet concluded, but the winner and runner-up statuses are being deliberately altered. IP addresses are misleading information about the winners and runner ups.
Despite repeated attempts to undo the changes, persistent disruptive edits from IP addresses continue. I had raised this request yesterday but did not properly convey the extent of the problem caused by those edits. MySlack1222 (talk) 03:13, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:18, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mass amounts of vandalism from unregistered users, following Hunter's Heisman trophy victory. Bulldawg (talk) 07:42, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2a02:2378:1000::/38 (talk · contribs) blocked by zzuuzz. If vandalism resumes, the article will be protected. Favonian (talk) 12:27, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBECR. Skitash (talk) 14:00, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations. As he is the head of the government in Bangladesh, this article is at risk of adding poorly sourced and biased info, so extended confirmed protection will prevent that. At least 1 year of protection will be good enough for now. Thanks. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 14:09, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:GS/SCW&ISIL. Multiple reverts made by IP 37.155.40.206 Mr.User200 (talk) 14:14, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because i believe that the metaverse is now less associated with crypto and the blockchain - especially after the rise of spatial computing. 67.209.128.24 (talk) 15:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Suggested action: Lower to WP:WHITELOCK/WP:PCPP to prevent disruptive editing from cryptospammers while still allowing for broader contribution from legitimate editors (especially IPs like me). Otherwise, if no cryptospam is expected, remove protection completely. 67.209.128.24 (talk) 15:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging @El C. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 16:19, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging @El C. --Ahecht (TALK
Reason: Decrease to "Registered account" often times it presumably make difficult for other WP:Wikipedian for instance In broader understanding the protection layer is unconditionally kept such high layer which doesn't fit after portably analysing the critics and marginally isolates its abbreviations within few hand and such consensual topic for a long period remain unchangeable applies for every WP:GSCASTE Pages 2409:40D6:109F:6A5F:FC1D:E520:AF8D:1E22 (talk) 11:10, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Also theirs an sensible point which i forgot tell before anyway if someone to equate any topic imbalance WP:Topic he will await for such long lasting time which dosent make any decisive preservation for wikipedia open prophecy Just like i devastated on Talk:Jats for underlying discussion 2409:40D6:109F:6A5F:FC1D:E520:AF8D:1E22 (talk) 11:15, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:20, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hopefully i am not responsible for such nuisance its an telecom company which was already fulfilled by Jio telecoms which was partially blocked by User :Spicyas rfpp allegiance of complainers But its not an right way to blame me 2409:40D6:109F:6A5F:FC1D:E520:AF8D:1E22 (talk) 11:26, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not unprotected – You've already submitted an edit request to Talk:Jats and should await its outcome. Favonian (talk) 12:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
This, I think, is the first time I've made a suggestion. Hopefully, I'm doing this correctly.
The lateral fricative voiced retroflex, as an example, has an IPA representation of ɖɭ˔ according to its Wikipedia page, but the IPA Pulmonic table and other tables use the Unicode representation in the table and any font I have found just doesn't handle that character,
Would it be better to use the IPA representation which I think many fonts handle since the table has 'IPA' in its title and its link points to the Wikipedia page with both representations? The linked article each cell in the table states that the representation the IPA version and that the Unicode character is implied from that.
I'd be happy to make a list of each table and cell where this occurs if that is necessary and you think these will be worthwhile changes. BLWBebopKid (talk) 19:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging @Kwamikagami as they are likely to have some insight to these issues. For me personally, I'm not sure. I happen to have fonts installed that handle the extIPA symbols, but I'm in the stark minority there. Remsense ‥ 论 01:46, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- ExtIPA is IPA. It's just a specialized subset. For example, extIPA can be used in the 'Illustrations of the IPA' published in JIPA.
- The issue is one of font support. The letters in question date to 2015, though they weren't added to Unicode until 2021. There are websites that list fonts that support various characters. These are supported by the SIL fonts, which are the best free IPA fonts available. If you don't have a good font installed, you're not going to be able to view IPA correctly anyway. That's why we have the IPA notice in articles, that you may need to install an IPA font to view the article properly. — kwami (talk) 05:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.