Jump to content

Talk:Artificial intelligence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 6, 2009Peer reviewReviewed

AI on Wikipedia

[edit]

Hi there AI - people,

I would like to know what the Wikipedia Rules Dictate regarding the AI on this software with a few questions:

1. What kind of general security and user security rules we have here, are extra and private AI - mechanisms allowed to operate here?

2. What kind of known AI - systems the Wikipedia software include?

3. What AI - companies or AI - corporations operate wherein the systems or Wikipedia software in general?

4. How to register a new AI- system or AI bot network to the Wikipedia, if possible and not forbidden by the laws?

5. How transparent is the supervision of AI - technology in- and outside the Wikipedia?

6. Do we have any AI Code of Conduct? Where to find it?

7. What about the other languages? Are the founded AI rules universal within the Wikipedia?

8. How to report when malpractices observed?

9. Any AI jury?

Sincerely,

-- Atlas Kartasto (talk) 14:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the artificial intelligence article, so you are probably unlikely to get responses to a list of nine questions that are unrelated to improving this article. That said, the short answer to probably all of your questions is that wikipedia requires edits to be verifiable by reliable published sources, and user-generated content created by an AI is not verfifiable or reliable. You can check Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Reliable sources for more information. Elspea756 (talk) 17:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Antitrust Inquiries

[edit]

I see that this subject should be included:

https://www.newsmax.com/finance/streettalk/antitrust-monopoly-nvidia/2024/06/06/id/1167664/?ns_mail_uid=0a5a0454-2553-4390-832c-8a5202b34053&ns_mail_job=DM633876_06062024&s=acs&dkt_nbr=010502igpxb0

If you like to argue that not necessarily, will you please explain before the editing. Kartasto (talk) 14:11, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTNEWS. Also this is really not on topic for this article. It might make a good addition for the articles on the individual AI products that are effected, though. MrOllie (talk) 14:33, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SU24 - Sect 200 - Thu

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 May 2024 and 24 August 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ryan1232378, Zq2197 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Zq2197 (talk) 04:28, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


AI welfare

[edit]

I have added a sentence that Roman Yampolskiy and myself have coined the term "AI welfare" in 2019 and provided as reference the article where the term is coined, which you called "blatant self-promotion", which is certainly a blatant exaggeration. I rather believe it is inappropriate to discuss this topic in this Wikipedia article without referring to our paper. Instead of just deleting my sentence, I'd appreciate if you could be constructive, e.g. by adding this reference from your account, if I'm not allowed to do so. Thank you.

See the article: https://www.mdpi.com/2504-2289/3/1/2/htm Soenke2008 (talk) 17:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Primary sources should not be used to support that a term was 'coined', and in any event there is no indication that this neologism is relevant enough or widely used enough to be worth highlighting in this article. PS: MDPI appears on predatory publisher lists. MrOllie (talk) 17:16, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Engineering in the 21st Century - Section 003

[edit]

This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 August 2024 and 3 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): GroupScientificDiscovery (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Secure cyberspace 10.

— Assignment last updated by GroupScientificDiscovery (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Main article templates

[edit]

Shouldn't there be main article templates next to Natural language processing, Perception, General intelligence and other sectoins? Wiktorpyk (talk) 13:58, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not always clear which is better, a simple inline link or the "main article" template. No strong opinion here. Alenoach (talk) 20:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]